Under what circumstance may Security Forces use deadly force?

The use of deadly force by Security Forces is justified primarily when there is an imminent threat to life. This principle is grounded in the need to protect individuals from immediate harm and ensure the safety of both personnel and civilians. The imminent threat must be clear and present, indicating that an individual poses a significant risk of causing serious injury or death to others.

In situations where there is a clear and immediate danger, Security Forces are trained to assess the threat quickly and make decisions that will protect lives. This aligns with the legal and ethical standards governing the use of force, prioritizing the preservation of life over property or other interests.

In contrast, using deadly force in defense of property generally does not meet the threshold for justification, as property protection alone does not warrant such extreme measures. Similarly, backup requests being denied is a matter of tactical response rather than a justification for lethal action. Lastly, while riot situations can be volatile, the justification for deadly force would depend on the specific circumstances, especially regarding the presence of a threat to life rather than being a blanket rule for all riot situations.